Quality Research International
The End of Quality 
Parallel Papers
Overview
Keynotes
Parallel Papers
Programme

in association with:
EAIR
and
SRHE

CRQ

 
Transforming Quality

The Seventh QHE Seminar in association with EAIR and SRHE
Transforming Quality

30th-31st October 2002
Storey Hall, RMIT
Melbourne Australia

Alphabetical list of paper authors:

Papers by title:

Keynote papers can also be accessed here:

Note all papers are downloads, either word document (.doc) or powerpoint (.ppt) and may take you to a blank webpage from which you will need to navigate back

Nirwan Idrus paper or presentation

David Woodhouse

Bjorn Stensaker

James Ratcliff

Lee Harvey

Parallel papers: Abstracts

Development Strategies in the Mechanisation of Quality Training Regimes Using Multimedia in Transforming Quality

Dr. Fauza Abd. Ghaffar
University of Malaya

Controlled product realisation process and well-trained staff are among identified success factors in the provision of consistently high quality products. Whilst the former could be realised with regimented execution of documents identifying the proper temporal sequence of the activities constituting a process, and as well as their interactions, the latter can only be realised with rigorous on-going or progressive training programmes. An effective solution for conduct of repetitive training programmes would be to develop a strategy for mechanisation of the training programme with multimedia elements. Development strategies for the most cost-efficient and fastest development of training delivery module (start to finish) were analysed using the Pareto analysis of individual identified process transaction duration. However, it should be clear that the results of such study are partially dependent on the complexity of the development and delivery model of choice.

Back to TopPaper

==========================================================

Improving the quality and direction of universities through student involvement

Oluf Riddersholm, Mia Kjersner
Graduate Students at Copenhagen Business School, Denmark

Despite all the emphasis on external quality procedures, a key driver for quality improvement at CBS has been the extensive and direct involvement of students in programme planning. The students have the opportunity to evaluate each course including curriculum, teachers and examination methods. These evaluations are used in the ongoing improvement of the programme in the direction that suits the modern demands of today's students and institutional administration. Using the students tacit knowledge and furthermore including student representatives in the decision making process at different levels of administration, has shown the importance of involving students when improving the quality of the experience and of the learning.

Back to TopOutline

==========================================================

Improving education quality with positioning theory

Lionel Boxer
RMIT Business, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology

Education quality is affected by adverse positioning through inappropriate discourse. Analysis of lecturers' comments has led to suggest that their actions to work with academic quality management systems in their universities are often confounded by the system. Positioning theory will demonstrate that discursive action affects the implementation of quality management systems in academia. Cases will be explored to show discursive action prevent lecturers from resolving problems and complying with requirements. Understanding the positioning phenomena and the social dynamics that leads to it may better enable quality management systems to be developed that truly deal with quality issues

Back to TopOutline : Paper

==========================================================

The quality assurance framework at the University of Canberra

Marie Carroll
Pro-Vice-Chancellor, University of Canberra

The University's quality processes depend on the establishment of an
integrated system that involves strategic planning, a data analysis and
feedback loop, which includes a range of input and output indicators,
achievement analysis, and resource allocation. The quality improvement and
assessment framework comprises three levels of plans: university-wide
strategic plan, university-wide tactical plans, and organisational unit
operational plans. The paper will focus on how the quality framework has been implemented at the University of Canberra.

Back to TopOutline not available

==========================================================

Educating tomorrow's knowledge managers - transforming managers from strangers to reflective peer-learners

Sandra Jones
School of Management, RMIT

It has long been recognised that management education requires transforming students from passive learners to active, reflective practitioner/learners able to cope with the complexities of their role. This need has increased as knowledge becomes the source of productivity in the information era. Effective knowledge managers need to both understand and be able to lead employees to a new way of thinking. This has implications for how quality of the educational experience is viewed. This paper presents a case study of a postgraduate management/ n leadership course that students enter as strangers and emerge as peer-learners able to reflect on their own management practice and lead as knowledge managers.

Back to TopOutline : Paper

==========================================================

The role of the course experience questionnaire in quality assurance

Phil Aungles
Department of Education, Science and Training

The Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) has an important place in quality assurance in the Australian higher education sector, serving a variety of purposes and uses. It is a unique national level instrument gauging satisfaction among higher education students. The paper will explore the strengths and limitations of the CEQ for quality assurance purposes. The CEQ has evolved over time in keeping with the changing demands on the higher education sector. The paper will explore likely developments with the CEQ including the recent extended version of the CEQ and the increasing use of qualitative data from the CEQ.

Back to TopOutline not available

==========================================================

Quality online education: new research agendas

Ian C. Reid
University of South Australia

Quality assurance and online delivery are hot topics in Australian universities, yet until recently these spheres of activity in universities may not have interacted very closely. This paper describes current debates within quality assurance and online delivery within universities and proposes four possible themes as ways to critique these debates. Arising from this discussion are possible research agendas that are likely to increase in importance as universities' use and reliance upon online delivery increases, and as the stakes for ensuring quality are raised.

Back to TopOutline: Paper

==========================================================

Ensuring customer delight: a quality approach to excellence in management education

Sapna Popli
Institute for Integrated learning in Management, N. Delhi . India.

Management education is at the threshold of transformation. The demands from industry, the students and society at large are puttinga pressure on the champions of management education in India. The competitive environment in the country has changed. The university system of education has been replaced by an upcoming and mushrooming growth in the number of private management schools. The numbers have increased but the quality of education maybe suffering. The paper aims at studying the level of customer satisfaction and developing a mechanism of providing customer delight to the customers of management education. There have been various debates on the treatment of students as customers, the paper still considers the students and industry as two sets of customers and after a measurement on their level of satisfaction the institutes of management education can strive at delighting these customers in the identified parameters. Customer delight is also one of the enablers to achieve total quality in any sector and quality does not need any supporting evidence to say it is a definitive route to excellence.

Back to TopOutline: Paper

==========================================================

Developing a framework for planning and continuous improvement: a case study of the School of Nursing and Midwifery, Curtin University of Technology

Juris Varpins and Chris Bright
Office of University Planning, Curtin University of Technology

Curtin University of Technology is utilising a planning framework that promotes processes to facilitate strategic thinking and integrate planning, review, and quality-improvement activities across the university. The paper provides a case study of the journey of the School of Nursing and Midwifery that embarked upon a process of managed change facilitated through the planning framework. An overview of the university's planning framework 'in action' is provided as well as a description of how an overall approach to planning was designed and how environmental scanning was planned and conducted. The work done by the school has enhanced the understanding of issues and has developed a shared commitment to an emerging common future.

Back to TopOutline: Paper

==========================================================

Internationalisation and ICT in a service university

Anne Welle-Strand
Department of Leadership and Organisational Management, Norwegian School of Management BI

In the international market of educational services, business schools have a large contribution. To investigate internationalisation of higher education and particularly the role ICT plays in this process two research objectives are: a) Investigate internationalisation strategies in higher education, b) Investigate the roles played by ICT in the internationalisation process. The Norwegian school of management BI is seen as a relevant case for the research questions. Data on BI's strategies, practices and potentials of internationalization and ICT will be the basis for a descriptive mode of analysis.

Back to TopOutline : Paper

==========================================================

Transforming the quality of international education: evaluating reviews of offshore programmes

Colleen B Liston

Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia.

Curtin University has policy on international education services with supporting 'Procedures for Assessment of New Programs and Procedures for Annual Review of Offshore Programs'. A major part of the annual review requires an assessment of each collaborator and all aspects of the collaboration. This paper presents a summary of evaluations of the fifty-eight offshore programmes offered through collaborators in 2001. It highlights the transforming effects of the procedures on schools offering offshore programmes and on collaborators. The reviews have also had a transforming effect on the policy itself with a revision being made following evaluation of the 2001 reviews. Curtin is one of the universities in the first round of the Australian Universities Quality Audit (AUQA) and has been able to present the outcomes from reviews, based on the policy and procedures, in terms of enhancements improvements made.

Back to TopPaper

==========================================================

Transforming the campus experience of students

Minakinagurki Srinivasaiah Shyamasundar
National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC), Bangalore, India

The National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) of India was established by the University Grants Commission in 1994 as an autonomous body to assess and accredit institutions of higher education in the country. So far 261 institutions of higher education (61 universities and 200 colleges) have been accredited. NAAC's process of accreditation has made institutions realise that quality is the responsibility of the institutions themselves. This realization has made the institutions initiate quality management procedures. For example, institutions introduced peer appraisal and student evaluation of teachers, issues that still continue to be the bone of contention in many countries. Collecting feedback from parents, alumni and students for improving the educational experiences and consultations with peers to overcome the weak links were initiated in many institutions. In particular, the attitude of the institutions towards the reliability of student feedback and the competence of the students to provide meaningful feedback underwent a tremendous change. This paper discusses the impact that has been made by this attitudinal change, which in turn has transformed the campus experience of students.

Back to TopOutline

==========================================================

Reflective and collaborative teaching practice: working towards quality student learning outcomes

Tracey Bretag
School of International Business, University of South Australia

This paper details the development of one course, International Management Ethics and Values (IMEV), which is part of the Bachelor of Management degree (BMgt) at the University of South Australia. Established in 1999, IMEV has undergone a number of changes, including an increased emphasis on collaborative teaching and the introduction of integrated communication skills. Using qualitative analysis (student evaluation of teaching, student e-mail communication and feedback) and quantitative data (grade comparisons), the authors suggest that a cycle of reflection and revision in relation to curriculum and teaching methods has resulted in quality learning outcomes for students.

Back to TopOutline

==========================================================

Independent benchmarking in higher education: reflections on an implementation

Kam-Por Kwan,
Educational Development Centre, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.

There has been an increasing interest in benchmarking as a referencing process for assuring and enhancing quality and outcome of higher education provisions. A number of major collaborative benchmarking projects have been carried out in the USA, Australia, UK and other European countries in the areas of library and information services, facilities management, admissions, financial services, academic practice, academic management, assessment practice and students' learning outcomes. However, relatively little has been written on how the benchmarking activities have impacted upon the organisation, or the practical problems that have arisen in an actual benchmarking process. This paper reports the implementation of an independent benchmarking study recently conducted by a university in Hong Kong on educational development support services in higher education institutions. It describes the objectives of the study and the methodology adopted, reports the outcomes of the study, and discusses the benefits of, and problems and issues in the actual benchmarking exercise.

Back to TopOutline : Paper

==========================================================

Quality and innovation in university education: contradiction or synergy?

Kate Patrick
RMIT, Melbourne.

The authors of this paper see different challenges in the relation between quality evaluation and educational innovation:
-Can a quality approach be sponsored centrally and still empower academics?
-What about the belief that universities are adopting quality systems because they mistrust academics?
-Can we open up the assumptions about teaching and learning underlying quality assurance?
-Must accountability smother innovation?
As a regulative idea, quality thrives best in conversation. To be successful, quality assurance must engage the diverse communities within the university in open dialogue. Our paper distils a conversation between the authors about what 'quality' means in a university.

Back to TopOutline: Paper

==========================================================

Action at a distance: transforming students? Transforming organisations?

Pam Green and Robin Usher
Research Training Group, R&D, RMIT

Does quality management transform students; does it transform institutions? Universities are experiencing an acute tension between autonomy and accountability. As they become more closely aligned with the market, how quality is defined, established and monitored becomes managerial rather than academic. The paper argues that quality management is most effective through 'action at a distance': by being removed from direct control over what is still the main function of universities viz. teaching and learning and research. Contemporary developments could be interpreted as undermining this principle. Action at a distance is being replaced by direct intervention and increasingly the quality agenda appears to academics to be more about surveillance and control than improvement and learning. Is external quality management facilitating excellence and transforming institutions or simply making them more hierarchical and less participative?

Back to TopOutline

==========================================================

Reflections on a developing quality management system: Another management fad or a sustainable approach to enduring, outcomes focussed enhancement of educational programmes?

Fiona Wahr, Alex Radloff and Kathleen Gray
RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia

This paper reflects on work done in the RMIT University Faculty of Life Sciences during 2001-2002 to develop and implement an educational quality management system that (a) would be consistent with the policies, standards and goals set by the university in relation to academic program quality; and (b) would also be capable of actualising these, by aligning policy, procedures and resources to achieve both process- and performance-related outcomes for programs. A key challenge has been the need to demonstrate that the Program Quality Assurance (PQA) system is not just another management fad. A SWOT analysis of the PQA system from the perspectives of key stakeholder groups - staff, Faculty executive, and university administration - shows that the PQA system has great potential to be more than a fad, but ongoing alignment of vision, policy, infrastructure and resources must occur at many levels of the organisation before its potential as a quality management tool can be fully realised.

Back to TopPaper

==========================================================

The impact of external approval processes on programme development

Philippa Gerbic, Ineke Kranenburg
Auckland University of Technology

This paper presents preliminary findings from a comparative study. Two models of external programme approval in New Zealand and their impact on programme development were examined. The focus of the study was the development and approval of two majors within the same undergraduate programme. Analysis of the two models of approval is followed by discussion of participants' perceptions of the ways in which the external approval processes influences the development of the programme idea, its readiness for delivery and team development. It is hoped that this study will prove useful with the development or further refinement of internal or external programme approval and accreditation processes. In particular, this paper identifies those aspects of the process that are likely to lead to further enhancement of a new programme and its implementation.

Back to TopOutline: Paper

==========================================================

The impact of national transformation imperatives and quality monitoring on programme self-evaluation at a South African university: lessons learned

Annette Wilkinson
Senior Lecturer: Unit for Quality Assurance and Management
Centre for Higher Education Studies and Development
University of the Free State, South Africa

In South Africa, the National Plan for Higher Education paved the way for major restructuring and transformation. In addition to employment equity legislation and a new funding formula, quality assurance have been identified as a steering element in the transformation process. The University of the Free State, being a historically advantaged university, put tremendous effort into the transformation process and tried to respond to national policy priorities without losing its focus on quality and relevance. The self-evaluation instrument developed for the 2002 programme self-evaluation (a pilot project) clearly reflects a transformative character with a strong focus on the systemic development and adaptation of academic programmes. This paper reflects on the influence of external and internal forces on the development and nature of the framework used as instrument, as well as the way in which the implementation of the project was steered to induce reluctant faculty to come on board. Valuable lessons were learned on the way.

Back to TopOutline : Paper

==========================================================

The balance of autonomy and accountability in London Guildhall University's quality management system

Paul Coyle,
London Guildhall University, United Kingdom

This paper describes the design and operation of the quality management system at London Guildhall University, which is an institution committed to widening participation to groups traditionally under-represented in Higher Education in the United Kingdom. The consequences for balancing autonomy and accountability, following the University's introduction of a flat management structure, are explored. Work in progress to enhance the quality management system is described including the increasing use of self-evaluation based on evidence, knowledge management techniques, and methods for the prediction and prevention of risks.

Back to TopOutline : Paper

==========================================================

Don't care was made to care: changing a compliance culture in a NZ polytechnic

Mark Barrow
Academic Development Unit, UNITEC Institute of Technology

UNITEC is attempting to cause a shift from a paradigm which views quality as systems compliance to a paradigm of care where quality is about making a real difference in classrooms. An institutional Quality Development Committee has developed a set of 'quality principles' to replace comprehensive standards and processes specified in the existing quality-management system, with staff encouraged to develop tailored processes, through controlled pilots, rather than unthinkingly implementing pre-defined institutional procedures. This paper outlines our experience to date and considers whether a paradigm shift might be achieved or whether the institute is simply moving from one form of compliance to another.

Back to TopOutline : Paper

==========================================================

Regulating the offshore activities of Australian universities: an assessment of the adequacy of existing quality assurance mechanisms

Christopher Ziguras
Research Fellow, Globalism Institute, RMIT

Offshore provision by Australian universities has grown dramatically since the early 1990s, making Australia one of the largest exporters of transnational education. During this growth phase, governments in both importing and exporting countries have increasingly regulated transnational provision in order to protect students from unscrupulous providers, ensure the quality of courses, and to safeguard the reputation of national education systems. This paper focuses on measures taken by authorities in major exporting nations to assure the quality of their universities' offshore operations. It compares Australia's regulatory frameworks with those of other major exporting nations (Britain and the United States) and new entrants to transnational education (New Zealand and Canada).

Back to TopOutline

==========================================================

Engaging grassroots academics in quality conversations and quality assurance initiatives: Opportunity lost?

Kim Watty
RMIT University

'Although quality has become the focus of attention, it's meaning is not always clear nor its usage consistent. Indeed, the notion of quality in higher education has no agreed technical meaning and its use usually involves a heavy contextual overlay of some political or educational position' (Lindsay, 1992). A decade later this statement still rings true. It will be argued in this paper, that the use of quality as part of a political project focussed on increasing layers of accountability in the Australian Higher Education outweighs the contextual education overlay suggested by Lindsay, where quality may be perceived as a legitimate goal for continuous improvement in the sector

Back to TopOutline : Paper

==========================================================

Transforming quality in research supervision: a knowledge management approach

Fang Zhao
School of Management, Business Faculty, RMIT University
Melbourne, Australia

The emergence of knowledge management approach has profound implications for transforming the quality of research education and training in universities where knowledge business dominates. The primary goal of research supervision in the higher education sector is the achievement of quality, relevance and completion rate. The effectiveness of research supervision process to achieve quality and relevance and to increase completion rate will be enhanced if knowledge management concepts are effectively integrated into the process. An innovative research supervision model which incorporates knowledge management process into research supervision to achieve the primary goal is outlined. The model demonstrates close synergies between knowledge conversion process and that of research supervision.

Back to Top Outline : Paper

==========================================================

"Do we really have to do this?": The purposes, problems and possibilities of the programme annual reporting process

Sophie Hayman, Elizabeth Kelly, Linda O'Neill
Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand

In 1993 a system of annual reporting on programmes was introduced at Auckland University of Technology (then Auckland Institute of Technology) as a tool for both the monitoring and the improvement of academic programmes. Some changes were made to the report format following an audit in 1996. Using feedback from staff responsible for producing reports for academic programmes within one faculty, this paper examines the original intent of the annual reporting process and some effects of the apparent tension between its competing purposes (accountability and improvement). We will evaluate some of the strategies that have been used to try to resolve the tension, and consider the way forward.

Back to TopOutline : Paper

==========================================================

Transforming the transformers: the impact of external quality audit on universities and ADUs

Debra Herbert
University of Queensland.

This paper reflects on the responses being made at one top-level university to external quality auditing. The history and evolution of the university's response to the advent of external quality audit in Australia is presented. In particular, we investigate the role of the university Academic Development Unit (ADU) in the transformation of curriculum and student experience. This involves it's role within the wider university context and consideration of the ADU's own organisation as part of the web of impact that external quality audit is having in the higher education sector.

Back to TopOutline : Paper

==========================================================

The service university and academic freedom

Arild Tjeldvoll
University of Oslo

Sources of discontent for the traditional Western research university have multiplied during the recent decade. Threats to academic freedom are related to appearance of new labels for university, such as The Service University. Current university development is analysed in terms of how globalisation, as a change in the research university's surroundings, is influencing the university's organisation and production. General and specific conditions for doing free and critical research within a market-driven service university are discussed in general, before the case of Norway is related to the international trends. In conclusion it is claimed that a global higher education market is unavoidable. The possibilities for continued free academic research within the historically new conditions rest with the professors' sociological imagination and strategic creativity in exploiting the possibilities of, particularly, the new information and communication technology.

Back to TopOutline : Paper

==========================================================

Establishing a national quality assurance system in Vietnamese higher education: background research

Kimdung Nguyen
University of Melbourne

A recent plan for establishing a national quality assurance in Vietnamese Higher Education has been approved by the Ministry of Education and Training (MOET). In this paper, background research for establishment a quality assurance system in teaching and learning is explored. The discussion is based on a study of the experiences of Western educational systems and a pilot study observing and surveying opinions of Vietnamese stakeholders on this issue from December 2001 to April 2002. The findings of the pilot study reveal that quality in Vietnamese Higher Education is viewed as that not only transforming students according to course objectives but also that meeting the needs of the fast changing society like Vietnam. In addition, frequent surveys to collect clients' opinions on the quality of graduates in order to evaluate the quality of teaching and learning are currently considered as a more appropriate option for external quality evaluation.

Back to TopOutline: Paper

==========================================================

Research and the curriculum

Kevin Dooley
Galway/Mayo Institute of Technology

The main question which this paper addresses is a strategic one. To what extent and in what form should the new universities and institutes of technology engage in research?

The literature and our research into this topic points to a number of areas of possible conflict between research and teaching. This presents problems for the institutes of technology which have been primarily teaching institutions with a separate identity from traditional universities. Higher degrees and postgraduate research are now taken for granted. At the same time it is crucial to provide and enhance an environment which facilitates a quality learning process.
.
Back to TopOutline : Paper

==========================================================

 

==========================================================

 

 
 
 
   
 
Introduction :: Keynotes :: Programme :: Parallel papers ::
Page updated 11 November, 2022 , © Lee Harvey 2002–2023.